There is a wide spread misconception that if you are a Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) you are also considered to be an 8(a) Small Disadvantaged Business. First, there is no such designation as an 8(a) Small Disadvantaged Business and second, the SDB designation is now a “self certification” through your Central Contractor Registration. The SDB program was discontinued on October 1, 2008 and replaced with the self-certification process, as Brian’s earlier blog discussed. The 8(a) designation is a Business Development Program that is maintain by the Small Business Administration (SBA). Briefly, the 8(a) Business Development Program consists of the following elements: A business assistance program for small disadvantaged businesses. An essential instrument for helping socially and economically disadvantaged entrepreneurs gain access to the economic mainstream of American society. Participation in the program is divided into two phases over nine years: a four-year developmental stage and a five-year transition stage.

The General Services Administration has two well-defined goals: garnering a variety of products and services for the maintenance and safety of the nation as well as maintaining sensible asset management. More recently, alongside the increasing global awareness of green solutions, GSA has become committed to helping the federal government and agencies maintain eco-friendly goals. GSA follows environmental policies that promote environment friendly products and services and helps federal agencies buy energy-efficient and recycled-content products.

The Multiple Award Schedule program recently completed a contract-wide rollout of contract Solicitation updates, termed by GSA as a “Refresh”, and an important new clause that I recently blogged about has been incorporated into every MAS contract. The new FAR clause is becoming increasingly familiar amongst GSA contractors, though many don’t know that it is now part of their federal contract. FAR clause 52.203-13 “Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct” is a perfect example of a few bad apples spoiling it for the whole bunch. Well, perhaps there were more than just a few, but this new requirement is largely the result of egregious corporate misconduct over the past decade. It came about when the DOJ formally asked the FAR Council to increase compliance requirements for federal contractors. The goal was for contractors to have a clear and contractual obligation to disclose contractor misconduct. The incentive to make known this type of illegal activity already existed through the Qui Tam provisions of the FAR by awarding whistleblowers a percentage of recovered funds. This same provision is reinforced in 52.203-13. The requirements are broken into two parts: the first requires a “code of business ethics and conduct” for all contractors that have this clause incorporated into their contract. I have included FAR Clause for reference, but if you have any questions about implementing this into your business operations, please let us know. Trust me, this is not something you can sweep under the rug!

Well it’s the end of January and almost half way through the 2nd quarter of FY11 and we are still working on a budget that is being sustained by a continuing resolution. A continuing resolution is a type of appropriations rule used by Congress to fund the federal government in the event that a budget is not passed on time. This is not an uncommon practice. In recent years, it has become the norm to pass continuing resolutions and continue debate over various department budgets. Republicans recently made a bold pledge to eliminate $100 billion from this year’s budget. $100 billion might not look like a lot when compared to the total size of the federal budget, $3.5 trillion, but don’t get too comfortable with the idea yet. There are a couple of key problems with their campaign pledge:

GSA Helps Local Law Enforcement with the War on Drugs

When helping my clients to obtain a GSA Schedule contract, I notice that many decide to volunteer to participate in the Disaster Recovery Purchasing Program (“DRPP”) as part of their offer. However, very few clients understand exactly what this program is and what it means for them once they’ve been awarded a contract. To clear up some confusion surrounding the DRPP and cover the questions I typically get, here’s a little bit of background information: On February 1, 2007, an amendment was made to 40 U.S. C. 502 to authorize the Administrator of General Services to provide for the use of Federal Supply Schedules by state and local governments for the purchase of products and services to be used to facilitate recovery from major disasters, terrorism, or nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks. These orders may be placed after the disaster or emergency event occurs, or in advance of a major disaster declared by the president. It is the responsibility of the state and local government entities to ensure that all products and services purchased are used specifically for recovery facilitation purposes. Since the amendment was issued, current GSA Schedule contracts have been modified as agreed upon by Schedule contractors and GSA, to allow Schedule contractors to participate in the DRPP. All vendors submitting new offers for Schedule contracts since February 1, 2007 are also required to indicate whether or not they will offer Disaster Recovery Purchasing.